PURPOSE
The goal of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness of ozonated
water as a hard surface sanitizer, knife dip sanitizer, and microbial
reducer on meat cuts. These tests used 3M petrifilm to acquire data on
microbial load reduction. This media is non-selective and allow for
enumeration of all aerobic viable microorganisms present. Samples were
analyzed following 10-15 second spray washing. The testing was performed
from 8/21/01 through 3/13/02.
MATERIALS
- Aqua Clean Mobile Sanitizer
- Sterile Latex Gloves
- 3M Aerobic Plate Count Petri Film
- Automatic Pipetter
- Permanent Marking Pen
Micro 90 Cleaner
- Incubator, 34ºC
- Sterile 2ml Pipettes
- Sterile Transport Swabs with
10ml Letheen Broth
- Hach Test Kit
- Steel Gloves
- Arm Guard
- Yellow Apron
- Processing Belts
- Cutting Knives
- Mezzanine Equipment (Final Grinder 5B, 6,
6B, 7, 8, 9 Hopper and Body)
- Contact Plates
|
- Boots
- Green Glove
- Air Knife
- Wizard Knife
- Hock Cutter
- Split Saw
- Brisket Saw
- 180ºF Water
- Tap Water
- Pig Foot
- Pig Ear
- Pig Hide
- Back Fat
- Jowls
- Belly
- Ham
- Shoulder
- Arm Pit
|
METHODS
All experiments were conducted in present working environments consisting
of both kill floor and
production areas. Samples were categorized as PPE equipment (steel glove,
arm guard, yellow apron, green
glove), cutting knives, organic material (foot, ear, hide, meat cuts),
Mezzanine equipment, and cutting
equipment (air knife, wizard knife, hock cutter, split saw, brisket saw).
Samples were sprayed with ozonated
water for approximately 10-15 seconds with an ozone concentration of 1.1
ppm to 1.4 ppm. Comparisons of
microbial counts were performed on samples:
- Before and after ozonation
- Ozone vs. 180ºF water
- Ozone vs. 180ºF water and cold water
- Ozone alone.
Swabbing was performed on all sample materials and transported to the
microbiology laboratory. All samples were aseptically transferred to APC
petrifilm and incubated for 48 hours. Counts were determined using a 10-1
dilution factor. Microbial counts 100 and greater were considered
unacceptable.
RESULTS
- PPE Equipment
All PPE equipment that was tested showed a significant microbial
reduction compared to before and after ozonation. A comparison of
ozone vs. hot water on steel gloves showed that ozone performed better
than 180ºF water (Tables 1, 3, 5)
- Cutting Knives
All cutting knives showed a significant microbial reduction compared
to before and after ozonation. For ozone vs. 180ºF water, both tests
showed acceptable microbial reductions (Tables 2, 5, 8, 9).
- Organic material
The contamination of pig ear, feet, and hide is extremely high,
comparison of microbial counts before and after ozonation show a
considerable reduction with some reduction to acceptable numbers.
Various meat cuts taken from whole carcass showed significant
acceptable microbial reduction (Tables 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,).
- Mezzanine Equipment
Ozonated water sprayed on hoppers and grinders in the mezzanine area
showed
similar results of microbial counts compared to standard methods of
sanitation (Table 4).
Cutting Equipment - For comparison of ozone vs. 180ºF water, ozone
performed as good as or better in
reducing microbial load than 180ºF water. Microbial reduction was not
observed for hock cutters for 180ºF
water but significant reductions were observed for ozone (Tables 10,
11, 12).
DISCUSSION
All areas, equipment, and samples tested for this evaluation were chosen
based on the criteria of heavy microbial load. An overall trend of
reduction was observed. The aqua clean mobile sanitizer did have a
significant effect on reducing the microorganism load of all areas tested
and sterilization of some areas was achieved. From these results ozone can
be used as a substitution of 180ºF water. Further experimentation will
continue and the utilization of a permanent commercial ozone system
enabling higher concentrations of ozone up to 3ppm will be used.
Prediction of greater microbial reductions from higher ozone
concentrations will be expected.
| Table 1 - Testing of PPE w/ Ozone
(08/21/2001) |
| Samples |
Control |
Test |
| Steel Glove |
TNTC |
130 |
| Arm Guard |
TNTC |
230 |
| Apron |
TNTC |
<10 |
| Blue Arm Guard |
TNTC |
70 |
| Belt 1 |
|
<10 |
| Belt 2 |
|
<10 |
| Belt 3 |
|
<10 |
| Grease Fat on rail |
TNTC |
<10 |
| Table 2 - Ozone Test (08/31/2001) |
| Sample |
Biotrace |
Control |
180 Water |
Ozone |
| Knife |
500000 |
TNTC |
4 |
|
| Knife |
25034 |
TNTC |
0 |
|
| Knife |
44506 |
TNTC |
|
0 |
| Knife |
36101 |
TNTC |
|
3 |
| Knife |
4307 |
TNTC |
|
*2 |
| Steel Glove |
|
TNTC |
TNTC |
|
| Steel Glove |
|
TNTC |
|
2100 |
| Pig foot |
|
TNTC |
|
**TNTC |
*Swabs taken 10 minute after spray with ozonated water
** too numerous to count but significantly less than control
| Table 3 - Testing of PPE with
Ozone (08/31/2001) |
| Samples |
Control |
Test |
| Steel Glove |
TNTC |
290 |
| Steel Glove |
TNTC |
50 |
| Yellow Apron |
TNTC |
0 |
| Yellow Apron |
TNTC |
60 |
| Arm Guard |
TNTC |
10 |
| Green Glove |
TNTC |
100 |
| Pigs Foot |
TNTC |
10 |
| Pigs Ear |
TNTC |
1060 |
| Hand |
|
0 |
| |
Date |
8/15 |
8/17 |
8/20 |
8/28 |
8/31 |
9/5 |
9/7 |
9/11 |
9/14 |
9/19 |
| 31 |
Hopper 5 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
290 |
<10 |
50 |
570 |
10 |
| 32 |
Grinder 6 |
400 |
TNTC |
<10 |
20 |
290 |
<10 |
TNTC |
<10 |
40 |
<10 |
| 33 |
Hopper 7 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
| 34 |
Grinder 8 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
250 |
TNTC |
<10 |
TNTC |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
| 35 |
Link blend belt |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
<10 |
TNTC |
TNTC |
<10 |
360 |
<10 |
|